I reflected on this outburst took place yesterday at the Kranes Konditor (the blog of EncreNoire).
I would first like to make known that EncreNoire is arguably the most streamlined sbudregona portrayed in the photograph of her published, and - for the avoidance of doubt - that the fat lady in question is not me.
Another premise is as follows: males are of mozzarella (and I say this advisedly, I am returning in the same category), and my favorite friend is right to sell.
That said, I wish to demonstrate that women are not the only victims of the slippery slope that we took.
cute I have a colleague, a true gentleman, educated and quite handsome. But poor in the barrel, and never a woman who expressed interest in him. What we need infer? Our common
colleagues defend the fairer sex by saying that "there is nothing wrong to seek a man with a modicum of stability," and do not have a point. At this point, however, why not add that there is nothing wrong with not even a man looking for a woman with a minimum of ... leanness', if that's what interests them.
I, however, I defend both sexes, and I think that my colleague, simply, you have come across women in poor, in the same way EncreNoire (along with legions of other women) came across unsuitable men.
EncreNoire points out, and for good reason, the media. But the media do nothing but repeat a refrain existing since prehistoric times, which requires a mindset far worse than the thin woman, that of beautiful young woman maintained by a rich man. Propinatoci model since childhood, because already in the fairy tales and folk tales. The absolute sovereignty of the male heterosexual wealthy and powerful it is administered as a drug with cod liver oil and fluoride rinses, transfusing the notion that, if we can not be wealthy men or beautiful women, we are losers *. (Indeed, the "losers" as they say nowadays, with a repulsive loser calculated on English.)
The same model, however, there has ** also inculcated the belief that happy marriage was necessarily beatified by eternal passion of love. But why?
If we are interested in finding a / a partner who meets certain financial requirements or aesthetic, it is our right to seek full /-a, pitiful excuses without affection, without guilt, and above all without feeling the infamous troioni.
course, if we talk about feelings, then it is quite another matter.
There are men who fall in love with women obese or frail, innocent or vicious, educated or uneducated, and there are women who fall in love with wealthy men or uprooted, or simple-minded villains, courteous or peasants. There
people who fall in love with people.
And may God have mercy on their souls.
************************************************ ***********
* Interesting to note that homosexual males have both made their charges, and added a third: if we can not be beautiful, rich and unexpected, we are losers ... even in the eyes of other homosexuals. Which explains why, rather than help each other, we spend our days in inventing new and unusual tricks to put another spoke in the wheels. This, in turn, explains why politically, we have the same view of a prostitute in a country of eunuchs.
** For once, it's not a typo.
I would first like to make known that EncreNoire is arguably the most streamlined sbudregona portrayed in the photograph of her published, and - for the avoidance of doubt - that the fat lady in question is not me.
Another premise is as follows: males are of mozzarella (and I say this advisedly, I am returning in the same category), and my favorite friend is right to sell.
That said, I wish to demonstrate that women are not the only victims of the slippery slope that we took.
cute I have a colleague, a true gentleman, educated and quite handsome. But poor in the barrel, and never a woman who expressed interest in him. What we need infer? Our common
colleagues defend the fairer sex by saying that "there is nothing wrong to seek a man with a modicum of stability," and do not have a point. At this point, however, why not add that there is nothing wrong with not even a man looking for a woman with a minimum of ... leanness', if that's what interests them.
I, however, I defend both sexes, and I think that my colleague, simply, you have come across women in poor, in the same way EncreNoire (along with legions of other women) came across unsuitable men.
EncreNoire points out, and for good reason, the media. But the media do nothing but repeat a refrain existing since prehistoric times, which requires a mindset far worse than the thin woman, that of beautiful young woman maintained by a rich man. Propinatoci model since childhood, because already in the fairy tales and folk tales. The absolute sovereignty of the male heterosexual wealthy and powerful it is administered as a drug with cod liver oil and fluoride rinses, transfusing the notion that, if we can not be wealthy men or beautiful women, we are losers *. (Indeed, the "losers" as they say nowadays, with a repulsive loser calculated on English.)
The same model, however, there has ** also inculcated the belief that happy marriage was necessarily beatified by eternal passion of love. But why?
If we are interested in finding a / a partner who meets certain financial requirements or aesthetic, it is our right to seek full /-a, pitiful excuses without affection, without guilt, and above all without feeling the infamous troioni.
course, if we talk about feelings, then it is quite another matter.
There are men who fall in love with women obese or frail, innocent or vicious, educated or uneducated, and there are women who fall in love with wealthy men or uprooted, or simple-minded villains, courteous or peasants. There
people who fall in love with people.
And may God have mercy on their souls.
************************************************ ***********
* Interesting to note that homosexual males have both made their charges, and added a third: if we can not be beautiful, rich and unexpected, we are losers ... even in the eyes of other homosexuals. Which explains why, rather than help each other, we spend our days in inventing new and unusual tricks to put another spoke in the wheels. This, in turn, explains why politically, we have the same view of a prostitute in a country of eunuchs.
** For once, it's not a typo.
0 comments:
Post a Comment